Advancing Shale Gas: Chemical Insights and Challenges

Focusing on hydraulic fracturing, environmental effects, and new developments, this paper investigates the chemical processes in shale gas extraction, therefore highlighting both current directions in the area and continuing difficulties.

Introduction to Shale Gas

An unusual energy source, shale gas has become very important in the scene of world energy. Mostly consisting of natural gas trapped within shale formations, which are fine-grained sedimentary rocks rich in organic content, it Usually involving hydraulic fracturing—a method that generates fractures in the rock to enable gas flow—so releasing either adsorbed onto the rock matrix or present as free gas within the pore spaces—the extraction of shale gas (Clark et al., 2013; Glorioso & Rattia, 2012) Particularly in the United States, where the shale gas boom has resulted in a significant rise in natural gas output, this approach has transformed energy generation and helped to create economic growth and energy security (Wang & Krupnick, 2013; Shar et al., 2017).

Shale gas’s value goes beyond its function as a domestic energy source. Natural gas burns cleaner than coal and oil, thereby producing less carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated (Song et al., 2015; Cooper et al., 2016). This has been noted as having potential to lower greenhouse gas emissions. Shale gas deposits have also been seen as a means of diversifying energy sources, therefore lowering reliance on imported fuels and increasing energy independence for different nations (Kuchler, 2017). Moreover, the worldwide curiosity in shale gas has led to major infrastructure and technological investments, so impacting energy markets all around (Tong & Cao, 2017).

Still, the fast increase in shale gas output begs social and environmental questions. Debates on the sustainability of shale gas development have been spurred by problems such groundwater contamination, air pollution, and wastewater management created during extraction operations (Song et al., 2015; Centner, 2016). Future viability of this resource depends on finding the right balance between using it and reducing its effects on the surroundings. Developing rules that guarantee ethical shale gas production while addressing public health and environmental hazards is increasingly responsibility of policymakers (Clark et al., 2013; Centner, 2016).

All things considered, shale gas is a mainstay of the current energy mix since it provides a greener substitute for conventional fuels and supports energy security. Nonetheless, given the related environmental issues and the necessity of sustainable procedures in the extraction and use of it, its development should be handled carefully.

Chemistry of Shale Gas Extraction

Commonly referred to as fracking, hydraulic fracturing is a vital technique used in the extraction of shale gas whereby high-pressure fluid is injected into subsurface rock formations to produce fissures that allow gas flow. Usually including around 90% water, 9% sand (used as a proppant to keep the fractures open), and roughly 1% chemical additions Yost et al., 2016) Carter et al., 2013) the fracking fluid’s composition is These additions improve the fluid’s capacity to carry proppants into the fractures (Z et al., 2022; Wattenberg et al., 2015) by lowering friction, preventing corrosion, and therefore managing viscosity of the fluid. Selected for their respective purposes in enhancing the fracking process, common chemical additions include biocides, surfactants, and friction reducers (Abdulelah et al., 2018; Wang, 2021).

These chemical additions greatly affect the effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing. Frictional reducers, for example, can reduce the viscosity of the fluid so enabling more easy flow through the wellbore and into the fractures, thereby boosting the general recovery of gas (Z et al., 2022; Yost et al., 2016). Furthermore improving the wettability of the rock surface by surfactants would help to improve gas desorption and raise production rates (Abdulelah et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2015). But the introduction of these compounds begs serious environmental questions, especially with relation to their possible effects on groundwater quality and ecosystem health. Research on methane contamination in drinking water sources linked to fracking operations indicate that the chemicals and gases can move through fissures developed during the fracturing operation (Osborn et al., 2011; Lutz et al., 2013).

Environmental issues related to hydraulic fracturing mostly center on the chemical additions employed in the operation and their possibility to poll water supplies. Alarms over their long-term consequences on human health and the environment are raised by several of the known to be toxic or hazardous compounds used in fracking fluids (Wattenberg et al., 2015; Kassotis et al., 2016). Halogenated organic chemicals, for instance, have been found in hydraulic fracturing wastewater and, if improperly controlled, could cause pollution hazards (Luek et al., 2017; Lutz et al., 2013). Moreover, the discharge of flowback water—which comprises not only the original fracking fluids but also pollutants leached from the geological formations—adds significant difficulties for water quality control (Wang, 2021; Kahralas et al., 2016).

In essence, even if hydraulic fracturing is a technologically advanced technique that has greatly raised the supply of shale gas, the chemical additives employed in the process can have major consequences for both efficiency and environmental safety. Both the sector and government agencies still have a great difficulty striking the balance between preserving water resources and optimizing gas recovery.

Advancements and Challenges

Thanks mostly for developments in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling methods, recent advances in shale gas production and processing have fundamentally changed the sector. Particularly in North America Gao et al. (2018), these developments have made it possible to effectively extract natural gas from previously unreachable shale deposits, hence increasing production levels. For example, the mix of horizontal drilling with hydraulic fracturing has let operators access more gas with less wells, hence lowering the environmental impact of drilling operations (Guo, 2023). Furthermore, the creation of supercritical CO2 injection technologies shows great potential to improve gas recovery concurrently addressing CO2 emissions by geological sequestration (Shen, 2024).

Furthermore used to minimize environmental effects are improvements in water management techniques during hydraulic fracturing. Proposed to maximize water use and reduce the volume of wastewater produced are rectangular pulse hydraulic fracturing methods (Badjadi, 2023). Given issues with water scarcity and the treatment of high-salinity wastewater, which may endanger local water supplies, this is especially crucial for the shale gas sector (Rosa et al., 2018). Advanced modeling and simulation technologies’ combination has also helped to better grasp gas flow dynamics in shale formations, thereby supporting more efficient extraction techniques (Guo et al., 2018).

Notwithstanding these developments, the shale gas sector faces major environmental and legal difficulties. The biggest issue still is the possibility of groundwater contamination since the chemicals used in fracking fluids might pass through fissures and influence sources of drinking water (Zheng et al., 2021). Further complicating the matter is the absence of thorough rules controlling the disclosure of chemical additives in hydraulic fracturing fluids, therefore restricting the capacity of authorities and the public to evaluate any hazards (Kahralas et al., 2016). Furthermore, the environmental effects related to wastewater disposal—including the hazards of surface and groundwater contamination—demand strict management strategies and legislative control (Lutz et al., 2013).

Further difficulties for the sector have come from public opposition to shale gas production motivated by environmental damage and health hazards. In areas like the UK, where shale gas production is still in its early years, community opposition has caused delays in regulatory clearances and increased examination of suggested projects (Aczel & Makuch, 2019). Dealing with these environmental and regulatory issues will be vital as the sector develops to guarantee the sustainable growth of shale gas supplies while balancing economic gains with ecological preservation.

In essence, continuous issues with water management, chemical safety, and public opinion must be addressed to promote a sustainable future for the sector even if technological developments in shale gas extraction have enhanced efficiency and lowered environmental effects.

References

Centner, T. (2016). Reducing pollution at five critical points of shale gas production: strategies and institutional responses. Energy Policy, 94, 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.045

Clark, C., Horner, R., & Harto, C. (2013). Life cycle water consumption for shale gas and conventional natural gas. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(20), 11829-11836. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4013855

Cooper, J., Stamford, L., & Azapagic, A. (2016). Shale gas: a review of the economic, environmental, and social sustainability. Energy Technology, 4(7), 772-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201500464

Glorioso, J. and Rattia, A. (2012). Unconventional reservoirs: basic petrophysical concepts for shale gas.. https://doi.org/10.2118/153004-ms

Kuchler, M. (2017). Post-conventional energy futures: rendering europe’s shale gas resources governable. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.028

Shar, A., Mahesar, A., & Memon, K. (2017). Could shale gas meet energy deficit: its current status and future prospects. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 8(4), 957-967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-017-0399-y

Song, W., Chang, Y., Liu, X., Li, K., Gong, Y., He, G., … & Chen, T. (2015). A multiyear assessment of air quality benefits from china’s emerging shale gas revolution: urumqi as a case study. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(4), 2066-2072. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5050024

Tong, T. and Cao, D. (2017). A mesoscale model for diffusion and permeation of shale gas at geological depth. Aiche Journal, 64(3), 1059-1066. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15982

Wang, Z. and Krupnick, A. (2013). A retrospective review of shale gas development in the united states: what led to the boom?. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2286239

Abdulelah, H., Mahmood, S., & Al-Mutarreb, A. (2018). Effect of anionic surfactant on wettability of shale and its implication on gas adsorption/desorption behavior. Energy & Fuels, 32(2), 1423-1432. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03476

Carter, K., Hammack, R., & Hakala, J. (2013). Hydraulic fracturing and organic compounds – uses, disposal and challenges.. https://doi.org/10.2118/165692-ms

Kahrilas, G., Blotevogel, J., Corrin, E., & Borch, T. (2016). Downhole transformation of the hydraulic fracturing fluid biocide glutaraldehyde: implications for flowback and produced water quality. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(20), 11414-11423. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02881

Kassotis, C., Tillitt, D., Lin, C., McElroy, J., & Nagel, S. (2016). Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and oil and natural gas operations: potential environmental contamination and recommendations to assess complex environmental mixtures. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(3), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409535

Luek, J., Schmitt‐Kopplin, P., Mouser, P., Petty, W., Richardson, S., & Gonsior, M. (2017). Halogenated organic compounds identified in hydraulic fracturing wastewaters using ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(10), 5377-5385. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06213

Lutz, B., Lewis, A., & Doyle, M. (2013). Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with marcellus shale gas development. Water Resources Research, 49(2), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20096

Osborn, S., Vengosh, A., Warner, N., & Jackson, R. (2011). Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(20), 8172-8176. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100682108

Sun, Y., Bai, B., & Wei, M. (2015). Microfracture and surfactant impact on linear cocurrent brine imbibition in gas-saturated shale. Energy & Fuels, 29(3), 1438-1446. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef5025559

Wang, H. (2021). Shale oil production and groundwater: what can we learn from produced water data?. Plos One, 16(4), e0250791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250791

Wattenberg, E., Bielicki, J., Suchomel, A., Sweet, J., Vold, E., & Ramachandran, G. (2015). Assessment of the acute and chronic health hazards of hydraulic fracturing fluids. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 12(9), 611-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1029612

Yost, E., Stanek, J., DeWoskin, R., & Burgoon, L. (2016). Overview of chronic oral toxicity values for chemicals present in hydraulic fracturing fluids, flowback, and produced waters. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(9), 4788-4797. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04645

Z, L., Ding, Z., Yang, H., Li, Y., Qu, H., Xie, Y., … & Zeng, S. (2022). Lab‐scale investigation of slickwater impact on methane desorption on longmaxi gas shale. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 46(2), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202200339

Aczel, M. and Makuch, Z. (2019). Shale, quakes, and high stakes: regulating fracking-induced seismicity in oklahoma, usa and lancashire, uk. Case Studies in the Environment, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2018.001719

Badjadi, M. (2023). Enhancing water management in shale gas extraction through rectangular pulse hydraulic fracturing. Sustainability, 15(14), 10795. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410795

Gao, J., Ning, C., & You, F. (2018). Data‐driven distributionally robust optimization of shale gas supply chains under uncertainty. Aiche Journal, 65(3), 947-963. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16488

Guo, B., Ma, L., & Tchelepi, H. (2018). Image-based micro-continuum model for gas flow in organic-rich shale rock. Advances in Water Resources, 122, 70-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.10.004

Guo, W. (2023). Recent advances on shale oil and gas exploration and development technologies. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 11(2), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.02.01

Rosa, L., Rulli, M., Davis, K., & D’Odorico, P. (2018). The water‐energy nexus of hydraulic fracturing: a global hydrologic analysis for shale oil and gas extraction. Earth S Future, 6(5), 745-756. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018ef000809

Shen, W. (2024). Advances and prospects of supercritical co2 for shale gas extraction and geological sequestration in gas shale reservoirs. Energy & Fuels, 38(2), 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c03843

Zheng, G., Deng, L., Feng, X., Sun, J., Lu, Y., Yang, Y., … & Wu, J. (2021). Environmental management of shale gas development in china: status and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20210901.11